Συζήτηση:Ελληνικό αλφάβητο/Αρχείο 1: Διαφορά μεταξύ των αναθεωρήσεων

Περιεχόμενο που διαγράφηκε Περιεχόμενο που προστέθηκε
→‎Heta: what nick says
Γραμμή 286:
I mentioned only left half eta, called heta, and placed its Unicode codepoint in article. Because it is consonant, while eta is vowel, heta shall be regarded as separate letter, because too heta and eta has different shapes. More is explained in this English article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heta_(letter) , along with relevant source. [[Ειδικό:Contributions/91.94.11.205|91.94.11.205]] 20:56, 17 Ιανουαρίου 2008 (UTC)
 
:Your source is "Nick Nicholas' Home Page" where the whole issue is discussed, again, under the general question of Unicode codification. Nick's problem is clearly how to represent in Unicode a different writng of the same letter. From the page :''This might still be patched up, if an overwhelming case were to be made that the codepoint is only to be used for heta qua letter. But this has not been the case historically, and even though the codepoint is a misfeature, it is unlikely to become the case in the future. '' I think this is original research spread across 4 wikis. I also think we should wrap it up in [[ήτα]] - <b>[[Χρήστης:Badseed|<font color="black">Badseed</font>]] </b><sup>[[Συζήτηση χρήστη:Badseed|απάντηση]]</sup> 21:30, 17 Ιανουαρίου 2008 (UTC) - <b>[[Χρήστης:Badseed|<font color="black">Badseed</font>]] </b><sup>[[Συζήτηση χρήστη:Badseed|απάντηση]]</sup> 21:30, 17 Ιανουαρίου 2008 (UTC)
 
These codepoints are final and will never be altered. This is NOT original research, but recent official addition to Unicode. In Heta article was mostly used text from Eta article. For proof that codepoints are final, look here: http://unicode.org/versions/beta.html [[Ειδικό:Contributions/91.94.11.205|91.94.11.205]] 21:45, 17 Ιανουαρίου 2008 (UTC)
Επιστροφή στη σελίδα "Ελληνικό αλφάβητο/Αρχείο 1".