Κανόνες εμπλοκής: Διαφορά μεταξύ των αναθεωρήσεων
Περιεχόμενο που διαγράφηκε Περιεχόμενο που προστέθηκε
imported>Krj373 |
μ Date maintenance tags and general fixes: build X1 |
||
Γραμμή 1:
{{
[[Image:Operation Provide Relief.Rules of Engagement.jpg|thumb|Rules of Engagement for [[Operation Provide Relief]], 1992.]]
In [[military]] or [[police]] operations, the '''rules of engagement''' ('''ROE''') determine when, where, and how force shall be used. Such rules are both general and specific, and there have been large variations between cultures throughout history. The rules may be made public, as in a [[martial law]] or [[curfew]] situation, but are typically only fully known to the force that intends to use them. The ROE should comply with the generally accepted martial law.
== Examples ==
Γραμμή 34:
The 1999 Marine Corps Close Combat Manual (MCRP 3-02B) presents a “Continuum of Force” broken down as follows:
*Level 1: Compliant (Cooperative). The subject responds and complies to verbal commands. Close combat techniques do not apply.
*Level 2: Resistant (Passive). The subject resists verbal commands but complies immediately to any contact controls. Close combat techniques do not apply.
*Level 3: Resistant (Active). The subject initially demonstrates physical resistance. Use compliance techniques to control the situation. Level three incorporates close combat techniques to physically force a subject to comply. Techniques include: Come-along holds, Soft-handed stunning blows, Pain compliance through the use of joint manipulation and the use of pressure points.
*Level 4: Assaultive (Bodily Harm). The subject may physically attack, but does not use a weapon. Use defensive tactics to neutralize the threat. Defensive tactics include Blocks, Strikes, Kicks, Enhanced pain compliance procedures, Impact weapon blocks and blows.
*Level 5: Assaultive (Lethal Force). The subject usually has a weapon and will either kill or injure someone if he/she is not stopped immediately and brought under control. The subject must be controlled by the use of deadly force with or without a firearm.
Rules of engagement are most often decided upon by commanders and are created to carry out and fall in line with over-arching orders or goals from higher command. In order for this to be accomplished, commanders must manufacture rules of engagement that will not violate the trust of the local population, but will instead foster a relationship of respect and understanding.
Γραμμή 48:
== Current Issues ==
The late 1990s and early 2000s has seen an increase in the use of [[private military contractor]]s particularly from United States and Britain. Contractors such as [[Blackwater Worldwide|Blackwater]] are not bound by the same rules of engagement, standing orders, or levels of accountability as are members of a national military force. This is a military policy problem as the wrongful actions that many civilian security companies have taken part in are taken as the action of the force in country; the actions of civilian security forces hired by the United States are taken to be the actions of the United States directly.
The fight against modern [[piracy]] has become the most needed field, where generally agreed ROE should be established within the [[NATO]] and/or higher level political panels.{{
== See also ==
Γραμμή 56:
{{Reflist}}
# USDOD. [http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/natoterm_index.html DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms: NATO Only Terms]. United States of America: ''Joint Doctrine Division, J-7, Joint Staff, Department of Defense''. December 17, 2003.
# Sagan, Scott D., Rules of Engagement, pp 443
# Private Military Companies, Taljaard, R. Yale Global Online 9 December 2003.[http://www.sandline.com/hotlinks/Yale_Modern-day-mercs.html Modern Day Mercenaries].
{{DEFAULTSORT:Rules Of Engagement}}
[[Category:Laws of war]]
| |||