Συζήτηση:Διώξεις ειδωλολατρών στην ύστερη Ρωμαϊκή αυτοκρατορία: Διαφορά μεταξύ των αναθεωρήσεων

You have all demonstrated care about this article, so I want you to know about the terrific amount of copy-violations and OR that was in this article--I'd say about 80% of it. I think I've redone all the OR, but I am not 100% finished replacing the copy-vios. I am getting close and I haven't given up. Apparently this person, whom I will not name, did their research on blogspots with a pronounced POV, copied from them, then went to jstor and other scholarly publications to items that are not accessible to most of us as they have to be purchased--and ''cited those items'' instead of the blogs as the sources of the copied material. I think everyone should know this is what's gone on here. No name calling, but this is clearly the basis of much of the conflict this page has generated. Epically bad research. Don't think this doesn't always eventually get caught out people! Someone like me ''always'' eventually comes along. If there is one thing about Wikipedia I have learned, it is that the wheels of justice turn exceedingly slowly here--but they always do eventually turn. [[User:Jenhawk777|Jenhawk777]] ([[User talk:Jenhawk777|talk]]) 19:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)