Συναίνεση του 1992: Διαφορά μεταξύ των αναθεωρήσεων
Περιεχόμενο που διαγράφηκε Περιεχόμενο που προστέθηκε
Χωρίς σύνοψη επεξεργασίας |
Χωρίς σύνοψη επεξεργασίας |
||
Γραμμή 5:
Ο ίδιος ο όρος επινοήθηκε τον Απρίλιο του 2000 από τον πολιτικό Σου Τσι του Κουομιντάνγκ, ο οποίος αργότερα το 2006 αναγνώρισε ότι συντάχθηκε με τον όρο.<ref name="Shih Hsiu-chuan 2006-02-22">{{cite news|url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2006/02/22/2003294106|title=Su Chi admits the `1992 consensus' was made up|author=Shih Hsiu-chuan|newspaper=[[Taipei Times]]|date=February 22, 2006|accessdate=Jun 10, 2017}}</ref> Ο όρος, όπως περιγράφεται από ορισμένους παρατηρητές, σημαίνει ότι όσον αφορά την αρχή της "Κίνας", και οι δύο πλευρές αναγνωρίζουν ότι υπάρχει μόνο μία "Κίνα": τόσο η ηπειρωτική Κίνα όσο και η Ταϊβάν ανήκουν στην ίδια Κίνα, αλλά ερμηνεύουν την έννοια αυτής της Κίνας σύμφωνα με τον δικό τους ορισμό.<ref name="Xinhua News Agency">{{cite web|url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-03/27/content_7865209.htm|title=Chinese, U.S. presidents hold telephone talks on Taiwan, Tibet|date=2008-03-27|publisher=Xinhua News Agency|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080512002546/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-03/27/content_7865209.htm|archivedate=12 May 2008 <!--DASHBot-->|accessdate=2008-05-30|deadurl=no}}</ref><ref name="1992 Consensus">{{cite web|url=http://news.xinhuanet.com/tw/2006-04/05/content_4385932.htm|title=1992 Consensus|date=2006-04-05|publisher=Xinhua News Agency|language=Chinese|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080707072656/http://news.xinhuanet.com/tw/2006-04/05/content_4385932.htm|archivedate=7 July 2008 <!--DASHBot-->|accessdate=2008-07-05|deadurl=no}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/NS/091/NS-B-091-023.htm|title=The history of the "One China with varying definitions" Consensus|date=2002-11-04|publisher=National Policy Foundation|language=Chinese|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080326193358/http://old.npf.org.tw/PUBLICATION/NS/091/NS-B-091-023.htm|archive-date=2008-03-26|dead-url=yes|accessdate=2008-07-05|author=Su Chi|df=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://video.chinatimes.com/video-cate-cnt.aspx?cid=1&nid=35720|title=李亞飛：92共識為兩岸個自表述一中｜政治｜中時影音｜中時電子報|date=|publisher=Video.chinatimes.com|accessdate=2011-09-11}}</ref>
Critics of the term, including Taiwan's [[Democratic Progressive Party]] (DPP), point out that because there was no agreement on the ''meaning'' and mutual understanding of ''China'' and which government, [[Government of the Republic of China|ROC]] or [[Government of China|PRC]], represents "China", it was not a "consensus" at all. They also criticise the term on the basis that it was not created contemporaneously with the meeting: according to former [[National Security Council (Republic of China)|National Security Council]] secretary-general [[Su Chi]], he invented the term in 2000, eight years after the 1992 meetings.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2011/08/24/2003511508|title=Tsai details DPP’s cross-strait policies|last=Wang|first=Chris|work=Taipei Times|date=2011-08-24|page=1}}</ref>
The PRC's position is that there is one, undivided [[sovereignty]] of China (People's Republic of China), and that the PRC is the sole legitimate representative of that sovereignty of [[One China Principle]] (and the subsequent [[One Country Two Systems]]).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.storm.mg/article/301816|title=新華社發佈報導禁用詞：「中華民國、台灣政府」通通不准用，「九二共識」不可提「一中各表」|date=2017-07-20|language=Chinese|trans-title=Xinhua News Agency publishes report on banned terms: "Republic of China", "Taiwan government" are both not allowed to be used. The "1992 consensus" cannot mention "One China, Separate Interpretation".|accessdate=2018-05-14}}</ref> The ROC's [[Kuomintang]]'s position is that there is one, undivided sovereignty of China, and that the ROC ([[ROC Constitution]]) is the sole legitimate representative of that sovereignty.<ref name="taipeitimes.com">{{cite news|url=http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2008/10/08/2003425320|title=Ma refers to China as ROC territory in magazine interview|work=Taipei Times|date=2008-10-08|accessdate=26 October 2009 <!--DASHBot-->}}</ref> The ROC's [[Democratic Progressive Party]] (DPP) position is that it recognizes the PRC as a country after [[Martial law in Taiwan]] was lifted and therefore there is now [[One Country on Each Side|one country on each side]], and each is a sovereign nation. In essence, it was the concept of an undivided China, regardless of [[political ideologies]] and [[governments]] that forms the basis of a continuous [[dialogue]] between each side, or there would be no such common ground for the attempt of dialogue to take place, which endangers ROC's to be in the state of further [[international isolation]] and alienation from PRC's international influence in the [[United Nations Security Council]]. PRC objects the concept of One China Different Interpretation by [[Kuomintang]], but stresses 1992 consensus as the [[wikt:prelude|prelude]] process of ultimate unification by the PRC, whether by peaceful or military means.
== Παραπομπές ==
| |||