Femke

Good evening! I think that your changes in greek wikipedia , https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/Υπερθέρμανση_του_πλανήτη are wrong, according the guidelines of wikipedia Alternative theoretical formulations from within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process. They should not be classified as pseudoscience but should still be put into context with respect to the mainstream perspective It is necessary to present alternative theories for the best of wp. "ΔώραΣ.'' (συζήτηση) 18:40, 22 Ιανουαρίου 2022 (UTC)

Hello :). Some of what was removed represented alternative formulations 15 to 20 years ago, but these theories don't have any support from within the scientific community anymore. Some of it was closer to pseudoscience back then already: for instance Willie Soon is famously known for being a climate denier and hiding his oil funding to spout his theories (Maxwell & Miller, 2015) Nobody within the scientific community takes his hypotheses on climate change seriously. It's corporate propaganda, rather than a significant minority opinion.

Note that 99.6% to 100% of published science (Lynas, 2021), and 98.7% of climate experts indicate that humans are to blame. Of those with most expertise, 100% indicate humans are to blame (Myers et al). Do you have current high-quality sources to back up your claims that these are still supported by a significant minority? Femkemilene (συζήτηση) 19:01, 22 Ιανουαρίου 2022 (UTC)

Money that funding research is crucial everywhere. All researchers paid from lobbies, fuel lobby, clean energy lobby, etc. The articles must have space for all theories according to the policy, that is my point. "ΔώραΣ.'' (συζήτηση) 19:09, 22 Ιανουαρίου 2022 (UTC)

No: policy clearly says that en:WP:fringe theories do not need to be included, and if they are included it should be clear that it's fringe. Please give me high-quality sources (such as review papers), showing it's not fringe. Even die-hard climate deniers have stopped saying things like "Η εμφανιζόμενη αυξητική τάση της παγκόσμιας θερμοκρασίας δεν έχει γενικά διερευνηθεί επαρκώς." Femkemilene (συζήτηση) 19:14, 22 Ιανουαρίου 2022 (UTC)

ο.Κ., then. "ΔώραΣ.'' (συζήτηση) 19:19, 22 Ιανουαρίου 2022 (UTC)

Uncertainty

First of all, sorry for my bad English.

Let me ask you uncertainty that i have. this wiki project "denial climate change" is lead by 2 people mostly. You and another user. Where is the conensus of community to do this ? Thank you. "ΔώραΣ.'' (συζήτηση) 20:34, 22 Ιανουαρίου 2022 (UTC)

It's not a WikiProject, and does not require consensus in advance. Simply deleting highly outdated information and misinformation is regular editing. That said, the large majority of languages has been very grateful for our reviews and direct edits. Femkemilene (συζήτηση) 20:48, 22 Ιανουαρίου 2022 (UTC)

And no need to apologise for your English, it's perfectly fine :). Femkemilene (συζήτηση) 20:49, 22 Ιανουαρίου 2022 (UTC)